1.) Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's Certificate of Appealability relying on incorrect facts offered by the government stating that Petitioner did not clearly request to exercise his right to represent himself, when it clearly shows in the record Petitioner did invoke the right to represent himself. If the record was provided to reasonable jurists they would more than likely disagree with the District Courts assessment of the Petitioner's Constitutional claim. Now in light of Buck V. Davis, and Tharpe V. Sellers should the Petitioner be granted a Certificate of Appealability. See Appendix F

2.) Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals improperly analyzed the merits of Petitioner's Constitutional claims in determining whether to issue a certificate of appealability ( Now ) in light of Buck V. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759 ( 2017 ) and Tharpe V. Sellers, 199 L.Ed. 2d. 424 9 U.S. ( 2018 ).

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's Certificate of Appealability