whether a mental state of recklessness - absent
Subjective intent to threaten - in conveying a threat is
sufficient to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C § 875(c)?

May a defendant be wrongly convicted solely under a
Question #2
Whether interpreting 18 U.S.C § 875(2) and other
threat statutes to include statements made without a
subjective intent to threaten violate the First Amendment?
That is, may allowing a conviction under § 875(c), as applied, to include statements
made without a subjective intent to threaten violate
the First Amendment?

Whether a mental state of recklessness absent subjective intent to threaten is sufficient to support a conviction under 18 U.S.C. 875(c) and any other threat statute