Whether the lower court's ruling violates the Supreme Court's precedents by improperly substituting its own view that carrying currency bearing a religious motto does not violate Petitioner's religion because Petitioner can hide the money in his pocket.

Whether RFRA allows the Government to force an individual to communicate and carry a religious message in violation of his sincerely held religious beliefs when the Government has not proven that this compulsion is the least restrictive means.

Whether the lower court's ruling violates the Supreme Court's precedents by improperly substituting its own view that carrying currency bearing a religious motto does not violate Petitioner's religion because Petitioner can hide the money in his pocket