I.- Whether the District Court failed where did not granted his motion for acquittal because the Government failed to produce sufficient evidence to support a finding that Petitioner knew the fraudulent SNAP transactions beyond a reasonable doubt.

Whether the delay to get an indictment and a superseding indictment had substantially prejudiced Petitioner, for sentencing purpose.

III.- Whether the Government's amount of loss calculation was flawed.

Whether the District Court failed to grant Petitioner's motion for acquittal due to insufficient evidence of knowledge of fraudulent SNAP transactions