No. 18-5800

Brent F. Williams v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-jurisdiction article-iii case-or-controversy civil-procedure heckler-v-chaney mootness mootness-doctrine standing standing-article-iii-constitution
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the District Court lacks jurisdiction under
under. Article III of theConstitution. Case or Constroversy
clause, in light of Heckler v. Chaney, 470 US 821 (1985)

Whether Primary Administrative Jurisdiction required
the District Court to abstain from adjudicatinq matters
within the exclusive jurisdiction of the administrative
aqency, empowered by Congress to administer the statutes.

Whether the Government lacked standinq to prosecute the
Petitioner under Article III of the Constitution.

Whether the Doctrine of Mootness divested the District
Court of Jurisdiction, when the case or controversy
became moot, and no lonqer existed.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court lacks jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution, Case or Controversy clause, in light of Heckler v. Chaney

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2018)

Attorneys

Brent F. Williams
Brent F. Williams — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent