No. 18-580

Nu Image, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: arbitration collective-bargaining-agreement declaratory-relief fraud fraud-claims intentional-misrepresentation labor-management-relations-act negligent-misrepresentation subject-matter-jurisdiction textron-lycoming
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

Do federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) over a complaint for intentional and negligent misrepresentation and declaratory relief, where the lawsuit seeks relief from claims that the plaintiff violated the parties' collective bargaining agreement?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act over a complaint for intentional and negligent misrepresentation and declaratory relief, where the lawsuit seeks relief from claims that the plaintiff violated the parties' collective bargaining agreement?

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-22
Letter of January 17, 2019 from counsel for respondent received. (Distributed)
2019-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-08
Reply of petitioner Nu Image, Inc. filed. (1/9/2019)
2018-12-26
Brief of respondents Int'l Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, et al. in opposition filed.
2018-11-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 26, 2018.
2018-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 3, 2018 to December 24, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-14
Corporate Disclosure Statement received.
2018-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 3, 2018)

Attorneys

Int'l Alliance of Theatrical Stage Eployees, et al.
David A. RosenfeldWeinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Respondent
Nu Image, Inc.
Martin David KatzSheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, Petitioner