No. 18-5778

Jon Duke DePriest v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus hearsay sixth-amendment testimonial-hearsay
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

WHETHER PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO
CONFRONT WITNESSES AGAINST HIM WERE VIOLATED WHEN THE
PROSECUTOR PROVIDED TESTIMONIAL HEARSAY STATEMENTS AND
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF A NON-LISTED AND NON-TESTIFYING
WITNESS TO PROVE THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER ASSERTED IN
CONTRAVENTION OF THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN
CRAWFORD AND IT'S PROGENY.

WHETHER PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS WERE
VIOLATED WHERE PETITIONER PRESENTED CLAIMS OF SIXTH
AMENDMENT CONFRONTATION CLAUSE VIOLATIONS TO THE STATE
AND FEDERAL COURTS WHERE THE COURTS REMAINED SILENT TO
AND NEVER ADDRESSED OR RULED UPON THE MERITS OF THE
CLAIMS SUSPENDING PETITIONER'S HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW OF
THOSE CLAIMS.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him were violated

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-09-04
Waiver of right of respondents Pam Bondi, Att'y Gen. of FL, et al., et al. to respond filed.
2018-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 26, 2018)

Attorneys

Jon Duke DePriest
Jon Duke DePriest — Petitioner
Pam Bondi, Att'y Gen. of FL, et al., et al.
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent