I. THIS COURT SHOUID CONSIDER WHETHER PETONER FARLY PRESENTED
HIS CLAIMS AT EACH LEVEL OF THE STAIE'S COURS FOR FEDERAL
REVEW.
A.PETITIONER HAS CEARLY ARTICULATED EACH FEDERAL
CONSTTUITIONAL CAM AT EACH LEEL OF STATE COUIRT
RENIEW, BY PLACING BOTH THE OPERATINE FACIS AND
THE CONTROLLING TEGAL PRINCIPLES BEFORE THE STANE
COURE.
B. EXHAUSTION OF STATE REMEDIES
IL. THIS COURI SHOULD CONEIDER WHETHER THE US. DISRICT COURT
RULING WAS REABONABE THAT IT WAS TRIAL STRAEGY FOR TRIAL
COUNSEL TO AlLOW PETTIONER'S PRLOR FELONY CONICTION- NAMEL
TI - TE T
By THELRY
PETIONER BIONOT TESTIEY.
X PETITIONER FLED, AND WAS GRANTED, A MOTION IN LIMINE
TO KEEP THE NAME AND NATURE OF THE PRIOR FELONY
FROM BEING HEARD
* PETTIONER ASO STIPUZATED THAT HE WAS A PRIOR FELOR.

Whether the petitioner's federal constitutional claims were properly presented and preserved for review by the lower courts