No. 18-5739

Terril Kinchen v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bank-fraud civil-procedure constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance sentencing standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the trial court plainly erred when it accepted the defendant's guilty plea to Conspiracy to commit robbery and two 924(c) charges where the defendant was actually innocent of these charges Pursuant to Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015)

II. Whether Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U.S. ___, 138 S.Ct. 1204 (2018) Pursuant to Ovalles v. United States, 861 F.3d 1267 (11th Cir. 2017) are beneficial to Mr. Kinchen

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the federal bank fraud statute plainly covered the defendant's conduct

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2018)

Attorneys

Terril Kinchen
Terril Kinchen — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent