No. 18-5702
Miguel Angel Mejia v. United States
IFP
Tags: article-iii article-three drug-enforcement executive-power jury-trial maritime-drug-law-enforcement-act maritime-law sixth-amendment subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
The parties to a case cannot manufacture federal subject-matter jurisdiction by stipulation. Nonetheless, the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, 46 U.S.C. § 70501 et seq., purports to give the Executive Branch the power to "conclusively" determine that federal jurisdiction exists over a prosecution based on assumed, rather than established, facts. Does the MDLEA violate Article III and the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial by giving dispositive weight to the Executive Branch's assertion that jurisdiction exists?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the MDLEA violate Article III and the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial by giving dispositive weight to the Executive Branch's assertion that jurisdiction exists?
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-08
Reply of petitioner Miguel A. Mejia filed. (Distributed)
2018-10-22
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-09-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 22, 2018.
2018-09-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 21, 2018 to October 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 21, 2018)
Attorneys
Miguel A. Mejia
Ricardo J. Bascuas — University of Miami School of Law, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent