which is unconstitutional for any reason, can a Court refuse to address that claim under conditions available at revocation hearings under Johnson v U.S., 529 U.S.C.E 94 (2000)?

when a releasee can show that he has never received a ruling-through no fault of his own-on the legality of his underlying conviction, do cases like Daniels v Ills, 532 U.S. 374 2001 hearings? Does it violate Due Process to allow the conviction or add new penalty while

Must Courts review successful reintegration or increase reincarceration rates, contrary to the stated purpose of release and Johnson purpose or protect

where a releasee substantiates a claim of judicial bias that has required recusal the claim?

Whether a court can refuse to address a claim that an individual is being incarcerated under an unconstitutional statute, even when the individual has never received a ruling on the legality of their conviction