No. 18-5666
Arthur Dennison v. Mark Hooks, Warden
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 certificate-of-appealability due-process federal-habeas-corpus federal-jurisdiction federal-review habeas-corpus sixth-circuit sixth-circuit-court-of-appeals state-prisoner statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
DID THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR IN DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY TO STATE PRISONER ARTHUR DENNISON TO CHALLENGE THE DENIAL OF HIS PETITION FOR FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS REVIEW BROUGHT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2254?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of appealability to state prisoner Arthur Dennison to challenge the denial of his petition for federal habeas corpus review brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254?
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2018-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-10-31
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-12
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Hooks, Warden to respond filed.
2018-01-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2018)
Attorneys
Arthur Dennison
Arthur Dennison — Petitioner
Mark Hooks, Warden
Eric E. Murphy — Ohio State Solicitor, Respondent