No. 18-566
Heriberto Menendez v. Marshall Garber
Tags: civil-rights commerce-clause constitutional-burden due-process interstate-commerce judicial-jurisdiction limitations long-arm-statute non-resident-tolling statute-of-limitations tolling
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a state statute that tolls limitations while the defendant is absent from the state imposes constitutionally impermissible burdens on interstate commerce when applied to a resident who permanently departs the state after the events giving rise to suit, yet remains amenable to service under the state's long-arm statute.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state statute that tolls limitations while the defendant is absent from the state imposes constitutionally impermissible burdens on interstate commerce when applied to a resident who permanently departs the state after the events giving rise to suit, yet remains amenable to service under the state's long-arm statute
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-28
Reply of petitioner Heriberto Menendez, M.D. filed.
2019-01-14
Brief of respondent Marshall Garber in opposition filed.
2018-12-13
Response Requested. (Due January 14, 2019)
2018-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 30, 2018)
2018-08-16
Application (18A176) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 29, 2018.
2018-08-14
Application (18A176) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 30, 2018 to October 29, 2018, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Heriberto Menendez, M.D.
Joseph Carl Cecere — Cecere, PC, Petitioner
Marshall Garber
Jacob James Beausay — Beausay Law Firm, Respondent