Does a trial court commit fundamental error when it instructs a jury regarding both "Penile/Vaginal intercourse" unlawful sexual activity with specific minor and "Penetration or Union with mouth of victim" unlawful sexual activity with specified minor when the information charged only one form of the crime and evidence was presented and argument was made regarding the alternative form?

Does the information, verdict form, and the jury instructions have to correlate to contain a lawful conviction?

Does a trial court commit fundamental error when it instructs a jury regarding both 'Penile/Vaginal intercourse' unlawful sexual activity with specific minor and 'Penetration or Union with mouth of victim' unlawful sexual activity with specified minor when the information charged only one form of the crime and evidence was presented and argument was made regarding the alternative form?