[1] DID THE DISTRICT COURT SIDE STEP THE COA DETERMINATION UNDER §2253(c) WHEN IT DENIED JACKSONS APPEAL AND HIS COA AND JUSTIFIED IT'S DENIAL OF HIS COA BASE0NTHE :ADJuDI.CATIoNEoFTHE AETUAL5MERITS 7

[2] WAS THE RESOLUTION OF JACKSON'S CLAIMS DEBATABLE AMONG JURIST OF REASON, OR WAS IT WRONG RESOLUTION APPLIED BY THE DISTRICT COURT ?

[3] WAS THE DISTRICT COURTS DENIAL OF JACKSON'S 2254 WRIT AN UNREASONABLE AND INCORRECT APPLIACTION OF LAW A S DETERMINED -BY THE SUPREME COURT ,WAEN I.TFAILEDTO AD-DRESS-.THE )TWO PRONGS OF STRICKLAND 7

[4] DID THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ENTER A DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH THE ESTABLISHED LAW OF THE SUPREME COURT BY DENYING JACKSON'S COA REQUEST?

DID THE STATE COURT COMMITT FRAUD ON THE COURT WHEN IT ALTERED THE 2002PROCEEDINGS OF JACKSON V. STATE DV ADDING A 3 TO 4 PAGE CROSSEXAMINATION OF THE STATES WITINESS APRIL WILLIAMS THAT NEVER HAPPENED 7

DID THELISTATE AND DISTRICT COURT COMMITT FRAUD UPON THE COURT BY PRESENTING FALSE STATEMENT OF FACTS ALLEDGING THAT THE PETITIONER HAD MOLESTED A.0 ON NUMEROUS OCCASSIONS WHERE THE WHERE THE STATE COURTS EVIDENCE REBUTTS IT ,.-CITING THAT IT ONLY HAPPENED ONCE.

Should the Fifth Circuit Court Appeals had granted acksons Motion for Judicial Notice and his Motion tohave Couns el Appointed??

[B] Did the Petitioner receive a full and fair hearing in State Court and the District Court.?

Whether the district court sidestepped the COA determination under §2253(c) when it denied Jackson's appeal and his COA and justified its denial of his COA based on the adjudication of the actual merits