2. Did Arizona State Reviewing Courts refuse to determine trial court's intentional Plain Error abuses of discretion to be perjurous ruling proved by the court record establishing trial Was Not fair Nor Complete where State trial prosecutor admitted and Compulsory Process, and Equal Protection of the Law Clauses Court precedent?

3. Does the factual circumstances of this cause presented and supported by the exhibited records provide the united troned accordingly, as a result of improprieties alerted to and Court inaction of clear substantial fundamental concern violation of United States Supreme Court precedent and United States Constitution provisions?

Whether the Arizona state courts violated the petitioner's due process rights by denying his post-conviction claims despite a lack of physical evidence supporting his conviction