Garland E. Williams v. United States, et al.
Whether inadvertent failure Circuit Court Panel Assignment and failure notice service of all alleged court contending deficiencies notices conflict divergence upon the Appeal's Procedural Law Commands allowed for prosecuting to hearing-adjudication?
Whether if assigned Appeal's Case Manager authorized decree disposition entering of a Want of Prosecution Appeal's Dismissal pursuant Fed. R. App. P. 42 conflict harmless error, and or inference omissions opposes Fed. R. App. P. 27 (a) (2) (A) (B) (i) (ii); (b); (c) Motion Rules' capacities, in compliance to Appellant's Motion Request for Appendix/Excerpts' Deferral pursuant Fed. R. App. P. 30 (c) (1), without the Circuit Court taken action?
Whether an implied non-abrogated sua sponte motion, and dissention of objection asserted; pursuant Title 28, Ch 123, U S C § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) [Against] a non-prisoner pro se litigant's complaint pleadings, and (IIP) motion; conflicted divergence upon the judicial Magistrate's fiduciary duty capacities; thereof, Title 28, Ch. 43, U.S.C. § 636 (a) (b) (1); subjacent implied preceding controlling congressional express command pursuant Title 28, Ch. 43, U.S.C. § 636 (c)(1)?
Whether inadvertent failure Circuit Court Panel Assignment and failure notice service of all alleged court contending deficiencies notices conflict divergence upon the Appeal's Procedural - Law Commands allowed for prosecuting to hearing-adjudication?