Reasonable Jurist would find it debatable Whether the District Court Erred When it Ignored Undisputed Facts Establishing that The Prosecution Violated their Obligation Under Brady v. Marylamd, Before they filed a Motion to Rescue the Conflicted Defense Counsel.

Resonable Jurist would debattable whether the District Court erred by Ignoring the prosecution's ongoing Brady obligation before Chavira-Nuñez was given a plea offer, got his attorney rescused or trial.

Ill. Whether the District Court erred in denied the Motion for Modification or Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

IV. Whether the District Court Committed Substantive error when failed to impose a sentence that was sufficient but not greater than necessary to comply with the statutory directive set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Whether the District Court erred in ignoring undisputed facts establishing a Brady violation before allowing conflicted defense counsel to withdraw