(1) Why did't J. Mc Donald acknowledge both exihibit t ," Brenda 17 and 18 in his Opinion? My Appelate Defender: I bohr speifically elaberated aout ho the shower Wet, Coiled-up, or " Curtain isn't doesn't appear" to have been used 3 (three) seperate times to lill megan/Ch. (nictin) thought it was (0) I prosecutorial Miscondnct for CoSign 1, their witnesses tes timuny to false t prosecutors plastie bag (a) There wasn't ever a re covered for Strangling (a) there Torturing Showering wasnt with down water, and "Hand-typed" by M7 prusecntor - in his Minutes of testimony; 3 the shower curtain isnt tashioned with respects to 2 ligatune The medical Records (3) were not part of the Thal Cenfused about U why 7 Bam Sorry NOT about it's messy-ne 470 (2010) Hemm: Lexis State of lowa, and vs 135

Whether the lower court erred in its analysis of the issues raised in the petition for writ of certiorari