No. 18-5606
Hagop Demirjian v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 amendment-782 circuit-split civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-discretion section-3582 sentence-disparity sentencing sentencing-disparity statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Issue #1 THERE IS A DIVISION AMONG THE CIRCUITS REGARDING ANY STATUTORY PRECLUSION FOR SUCCESSIVE §3582 MOTIONS, EMPLOYING U.S. v. Beard, 745 F.3d 288 (7th Cir. 2014).
Issue #2 THE DISTRICT COURT CREATED A SENTENCE DISPARITY IN DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION, WHILE GRANTING JUAN ALMONACID'S MOTION PURSUANT TO §3582 AND AMENDMENT 782, WITHOUT RECOURSE TO THE
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there is a statutory preclusion for successive §3582 motions
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2018)
Attorneys
Hagop Demirjian
Hagop Demirjian — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent