No. 18-56

Tim Shoop, Warden v. Danny Hill

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-10
Status: GVR
Type: Paid
Relisted (9)
Tags: aedpa antiterrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act atkins-standard atkins-v-virginia clinical-judgment clinical-judgments death-penalty eighth-amendment habeas-corpus intellectual-disability moore-v-texas
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04 (distributed 9 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Sixth Circuit properly use the Moore decision from 2017 to find that an Ohio court unreasonably applied Atkins in 2008, even though the Ohio court relied on the clinical judgments of experts to find that Hill was not intellectually disabled?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Sixth Circuit properly use the Moore decision from 2017 to find that an Ohio court unreasonably applied Atkins in 2008, even though the Ohio court relied on the clinical judgments of experts to find that Hill was not intellectually disabled?

Docket Entries

2019-02-08
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-01-07
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
2019-01-07
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2018-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-10-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-10
Reply of petitioner Tim Shoop, Warden filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2018-08-29
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Danny Hill.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2018-08-29
Brief of respondent Danny Hill in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2018-07-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 30, 2018.
2018-07-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 9, 2018 to August 30, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2018-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2018)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Danny Hill
Vicki Ruth Adams Werneke — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Northern District of Ohio, Respondent
Tim Shoop, Warden
Eric E. Murphy — Ohio State Solicitor, Petitioner