Whether the District Court committed error by failing to
sustain the defense objection to the four-level enhancement
of the sentence under USSG section 2K2.1(b)(6)(b) based
upon the finding that the Government proved the facts by a
preponderance of the evidence that the Appellant possessed
the firearm "in connection with another felony offense?

Whether, for the purposed of further review, 18 U.S.C
section 922(g) is facially unconstitutional because it
exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, and
is unconstitutional as applied to Mr. Mitchell's intrastate
possession of a firearm and ammunition?

Whether the District Court committed error by failing to sustain the defense objection to the four-level enhancement of the sentence under USSG section 2K2.1(b)(6)(b)