Question 1: Whether The Court Erred Finding Claim One - Three where not Exhausted To The State's Highest Court In Violation Of The Fourteenth

Question 2: Did The Court Abused Its Discretion To Consider And Recommend Denying The Claims Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2), Which Was Based On An Erroneous Presumption That The Three Claims Not Exhausted Had No Merit .

Question 3. Did The Lower Court Err Finding No Merit In The Denial Of The Motion To Suppress Statement In Violation Of The Fourteenth Amendtnent

Question 4. Did The Lower Court Err Finding No Merit In The Denial Of Motion For Mistrial, In Violation Of The Fourteenth

Question 5. Did The Lower Court Err Finding No Merit In Sufficiency Of Evidence To Support Manslaughter Rather Than Second Degree Murder In Violation Of The Fourteenth Amendment.

Question 6. The court erred finding no merit in the claim that Counsel Was Ineffective in Failing to Insure Madrid Was Represented by Conflict Free Counsel In Violation Of The. Sixth And Fourteenth

Question 7. The court erred finding the Trial Court's Failure to Eliminate the Conflict of Interest had no merit In Violation Of The Fourteenth Amendment .

Question 8. The Court Erred Finding The Ineffective Assistance Of Appellate Counsel Claim Had No Merit In Violation Of The Fourteenth

Whether the court erred in finding claims 1-3 were not exhausted to the state's highest court