WHETHER TRIAL COURT ABUSED THEIR AUTHORITY BY ALLOWING
THE STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE TO IMPOSE A SENTENCE CONTRARY
TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW ON DOUBLE JEOPARDY?

WHETHER TRIAL JUDGE ABUSED THEIR AUTHORITY BY IMPOSING
A HABITUAL SENTENCE ON PETITIONER WITHOUT A LAWFUL
CAUSETODOSO?

WHETHER 3" D.C.A. JUDGES ABUSED THEIR AUTHORITY BY
REFUSING TO COMPLY WITH THEIR OWN LAWS ON PETITIONER
CLAIMS.

WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT JUDGES ABUSED THEIR
AUTHORITY BY REFUSING TO ADDRESS PETITIONER'S CLAIM ON
THE PROPER JURISDICTION TO ADDRESS PETITIONER CLAIMS ON
ONE SINGLE EPISODE?

WHY TRIAL JUDGE CONDONE ALL CLAIMS ON PETITIONER'S
ILLEGAL SENTENCE?

WHETHER ALL FLORIDA COURTS VIOLATED RULE 10 SEC (b)(c) BY
REFUSING TO RESOLVE PETITIONER'S CONFLICT, ON ILLEGAL
SENTENCE.

Whether trial court abused their authority by allowing the state attorney office to impose a sentence contrary to the requirements of the law on double jeopardy?