No. 18-5573

Tajuan Williams v. Sherman Campbell, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law contraband due-process evidence-gathering fourth-amendment prison prison-regulations prisoner-rights regulations
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (from Petition)

1
Should this Court review thie case, de novo to
address the importancs to the public of the issue in
keeping contraband items out of prieons end out of the
hands of prisoners end the importance of the public to
the issue in keeping prison officials from violeting
prison regulations in order to provide contrabend items
to prisoners

II Should this Court clerify the law ae to whether, the
violation of orison regulation renders the seizure of a
prisoner's oral and written communicetions unreesoneble
within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment of the U S
Constitution.

III Whether it should be settled by this Court, "if the
violation of prieon regulations by prioon officiels
without euthorization violateb • defendant's Fourteenth
Amendment U S Constitution rights under the laws when
the unauthorized acts was committed to gather evidencs
in a criminal prosectuion "

IV Whether it should be clerified by this Court es to
whe ther,
"the Stoudemire doctrine should apply in
Petitioner's case and other case involving :
similarly
situated prisoners "

V
whether
it should be clarifled by
this
Court
whether,"a
court order should be
oought
by
prison
official
prior
to
recording
prisoner
for
8
non
and
prior
to
relessing
penological
roesons
thoee
private communicatione to the public "

VI Should this Court resolve the dioagreomant smong the
lower courts regerding the Cohen doctrine

VII
doctrine should equally apply to convicted prisons as to
pre-triel detainees where Hudson did not contemplate
cell searchee and seizures instigeted by prosecutors and
law anforcement

VIII
Whether this Court should review Patitioner'a
the question presented by the Petitloner that the MOOC
never received proper authorizetion for the tranefer of
Petitioner or plecement of the recording device

IX Whether the Petitloner's cese should be remanded,
counsel appointed and en evidantiery hearing co

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should the Court review the case, de novo, to address the importance to the public of the issue in keeping contraband items out of prisons and out of the hands of prisoners and the importance of the public to the issue in keeping prison officials from violating prison regulations in order to provide contraband items to prisoners

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-11
Waiver of right of respondent Sherman Campbell, Warden to respond filed.
2018-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2018)
2018-06-13
Application (17A1368) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 18, 2018.
2018-06-04
Application (17A1368) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 19, 2018 to August 18, 2018, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Sherman Campbell, Warden
Aaron David LindstromMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Tajuan Williams
Tajuan Williams — Petitioner