No. 18-5548
Brian Tuttle v. Allied Nevada Gold Corp., et al.
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review article-iii-courts bankruptcy-appeals bankruptcy-courts bankruptcy-jurisdiction bankruptcy-law constitutional-rights equitable-mootness judicial-doctrine statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-01-18
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Article III courts can refuse to exercise appellate jurisdiction assigned to them by Congress over final decisions of non-Article III bankruptcy courts on a determination of "equitable mootness," and, if that doctrine exists, (a) what is the appropriate standard of review, and (b) whether it can invoked when relief is available that would not scramble a bankruptcy plan or hurt third parties.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Article III courts can refuse to exercise appellate jurisdiction assigned to them by Congress over final decisions of non-Article III bankruptcy courts on a determination of equitable mootness
Docket Entries
2019-01-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-01-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-12-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-22
Reply of petitioner Brian Tuttle filed.
2018-10-11
Brief of respondents Allied Nevada Gold Corp., et al. in opposition filed.
2018-09-11
Response Requested. (Due October 11, 2018)
2018-08-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-14
Waiver of right of respondents Allied Nevada Gold Corp., et al. to respond filed.
2018-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 10, 2018)
Attorneys
Allied Nevada Gold Corp., et al.
Pratik Arvind Shah — Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Respondent
Brian Tuttle
Christopher J. Wright — Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis, LLP, Petitioner
Brian Tuttle — Petitioner