Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erroneously speculated in conflict with the principles enunciated by this Court in Molina-Martinez v. United States, 578 U. S. _, 136 S. Ct. 1338, 194 L. Ed. 2d 444 (2016) and Peugh v. United States, 569 U.S. 530 (2013) and with the approach taken by the Third and Seventh Circuits that the District Court would have imposed the same sentence on a criminal defendant even when faced with a drastic reduction in the applicable Guidelines range that formed the starting point, anchor and framework of its sentencing decision.

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erroneously speculated that the District Court would have imposed the same sentence on a criminal defendant even when faced with a drastic reduction in the applicable Guidelines range