No. 18-553

Juliet Yackel v. South Dakota, et al.

Lower Court: South Dakota
Docketed: 2018-10-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: atkins-claim atkins-v-virginia conflict-of-interest counsel-representation death-penalty death-penalty-appeal eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel intellectual-disability moore-v-texas
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Was Rodney Berget arbitrarily deprived of his entitlement to conflict free counsel in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment when his counsel determined not to file an otherwise meritorious appeal because he decided that doing so would be contrary to his spiritual duties?

2. Can a prisoner who has made a substantial threshold showing that he is intellectually disabled waive the claim that the Eighth Amendment as interpreted in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) precludes his execution?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Rodney Berget was arbitrarily deprived of conflict-free counsel in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment when his counsel determined not to file an otherwise meritorious appeal because he decided that doing so would be contrary to his spiritual duties

Docket Entries

2018-10-29
Application (18A449) referred to the Court.
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-29
Application (18A449) denied by the Court.
2018-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 28, 2018)
2018-10-29
Application (18A449) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
2018-10-29
Brief of respondent South Dakota, et al. in opposition filed.
2018-10-29
Reply of petitioner Juliet Yackel filed.

Attorneys

Juliet Yackel
Elliot H. ScherkerGreenberg Traurig, Petitioner
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, et al.
Paul S. Swedlund — Respondent