CAN A CLAIM OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE GIVEN THAT THE STATE PRESENTED FALSE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL NAMELY PERJURED TESTIMONY FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND THAT CONSTITUTIONAL ERROR RESULTED IN THE CONVICTION OF ONE WHO IS ACTUALLY INNOCENT AND A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE OCCURRED. APPLYING "FUNDAMENTAL MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE EXCEPTION" AND ASKING FOR AN EQUITABLE EXCEPTION NOT EQUITABLE TO INS AND PRESENTING "NEW" RELIABLE EVIDENCE WRONGLY EXCLUDED AND EVIDENCE OBTAIN BY PETITIONER NOT PRESENTED FOR JUROR'S ASSESSMENT NEEDED FOR PROOF TO PROVE PERJURED TESTIMONY AND CRITICAL FOR AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE IF-DEFENSE CAN CAN HIS CLAIM OVERCOME THE ENSE LIMITATION PERIOD? UNDER 28 U.S.C.S § 2244 (D)

CAN A CLAIM OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE GIVEN THAT THE STATE PRESENTED FALSE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL NAMELY PERJURED TESTIMONY FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS BEING THE UNCERTAIN CONSTITUTION CLAIM, IS THIS CLAIM NOT SO SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF THE 5TH & 14TH AMEND DUE PROCESS RIGHT OF A VALID CLAIM SAL IS CONSTITUTIONAL BY IN) NATURE ITSELF AS STATED? IS IT NOT SUFFICIENT TO GRANT A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY UNDER 28 U.S.C.S 2253 (D)(2)

Claim of actual innocence given that the state presented false evidence at trial, namely fraudulent testimony from law enforcement officers