I. DOES THE USE OF A TRAI NED DRUG DOG TO SNIFF THE
DOORWAY OF A RESIDENCE VIOLATE THE RESIDENT'S
REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY UNDER KATZ V.
UNITED STATES , 389 U.S. 347 (1967)?

II. DOES THE DOORWAY OF AN APARTMENT LOCATED
WITHIN AN APARTMENT BUILDING CONSTITUTE THE
APARTMENT'S CURTILAGE SO THAT THE USE OF A TRAINED
DRUG DOG TO SMELL THE D OORWAY FOR THE ODOR OF
NARCOTICS CONSTITUTES A SEARCH UNDER FLORIDA V.
JARDINES , 133 S.Ct. 1409 (2013)?

Does the use of a trained drug dog to sniff the doorway of a residence violate the resident's reasonable expectation of privacy?