Does preclusion of an accused citizen's PTSD diagnosis, proffered to support her self-defense claim, unconstitutionally impinge on her Due Process guarantee of a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense?

Is a PTSD diagnosis proper "observation evidence", or does such a diagnosis constitute inadmissible "opinion testimony" under Clark v. Arizona, 548 U.S. 745, 126 S.Ct. 2709 (2006)?

Did the Arizona Court of Appeals err, and thus again violate Petitioner's Due Process right to present a complete defense, in categorizing Petitioner's proffered evidence of cortisol's effects as inadmissible diminished capacity evidence?

Whether preclusion of an accused citizen's PTSD diagnosis, proffered to support her self-defense claim, unconstitutionally impinges on her Due Process guarantee of a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense