No. 18-5493
Maceo Gant v. Thomas Winn, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability district-court district-court-decision due-process federal-jurisdiction final-judgment habeas-corpus jurisdiction plea-bargain plea-conviction sixth-circuit state-court-conviction unresolved-claims
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the sixth circuit had warrant to assume jurisdiction and consider petitioner's unresolved challenges to his state court plea conviction, where the district court never issued a final decision when it disposed of some of the claims petitioner presented in his habeas petition, but less than all of them.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit had jurisdiction to consider the petitioner's unresolved challenges to his state court plea conviction where the district court did not issue a final decision on all claims presented in the habeas petition
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-05
Waiver of right of respondent Thomas Winn, Warden to respond filed.
2018-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Maceo Gant
Maceo Gant — Petitioner
Thomas Winn, Warden
Aaron David Lindstrom — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent