1)IN HIS CASE, THE GUILTY PLEA WAS NOT ONLY INCOMPREHENSIVE, BUT COERCE AND MADE THROUGH DURESS BY RELYING ON GROSSLY MISINFORMATION BY COUNSEL. I WOULD LIKE THE COURTS TO REVIEW THE CIRCUMSTANCES BEFORE THE GUILTY PLEA WAS IMPOSED.

2)HOW COULD A DEFENDANT WITH A RECORDED CASE OF LEARNING DISABILITY (L.D.) FULLY COMPREHEND THE TOTALITY OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF A GUILTY PLEA WITHOUT ALLOCUTION, ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL OR A PROPER COLLOQUY FROM A TRIAL JUDGE?

3)I WOULD LIKE THE COURTS TO REVIEW ANY KNOWN POSSIBILITIES OF A "UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL" THAT WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED THE EVIDENCE AND SUGGESTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH'S FINDINGS.

4) FINALLY IF THE COURTS COULD BE SO KIND TO REVIEW THE FACTUAL EVIDENCE (D.N.A, FINGER PRINTS, FOOTPRINTS ECT.) IN THIS CASE THAT IS ABSOLUTELY NOT A MATCH TO THE APPLICANT.

Whether a defendant with a learning disability can be accepted a guilty plea without proper allocation, assistance of counsel, and a thorough colloquy from the trial judge to ensure the defendant fully understands the consequences of the plea