No. 18-548

Adorers of the Blood of Christ, United States Province, et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (2)
Tags: administrative-procedure agency-action federal-energy-regulatory-commission judicial-review natural-gas-act religious-exercise religious-freedom-restoration-act standing
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)
protects the free exercise of religion by prohibiting the
government from substantially burdening a person's
religious exercise and guaranteeing that individualsmay assert a violation of RF RA as a claim in a judicial
proceeding and obtain appropriate relief. 42 U.S.C.§ 2000bb-1(a), (c). Federal statutory law is subject toRFRA unless specifically exempted. Id. § 2000bb-3(b).
The Natural Gas Act (NGA) applies to the
transportation of natural gas in interstate commerceand authorizes the Federal Energy RegulatoryCommission (FERC) to issue orders grantingapplications for new pipelines. Third persons to anapplication must strictly comply with the NGA'sadministrative procedure to obtain judicial review of anorder, including intervening and requesting rehearingbefore FERC. 15 U.S.C. § 717r (a), (b). A circuit court
then has exclusive but limited jurisdiction to "affirm,modify, or set aside" the order. Id. § 717r(b). Congress
did not exempt the NGA from RFRA.

1. Must a person intervene in an application and
follow the required administrative procedures forobjecting to proposed agency action in order to preventthe government agency from later burdening herreligious exercise in violation of RFRA?

2. Does circuit court review of an administrative
agency's order satisfy RFRA's guarantee to assert aclaim in a judicial proceeding and obtain appropriaterelief against the government?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether RFRA claims must be exhausted through administrative procedures before being asserted in court

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The Rutherford Institute GRANTED.
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-07
Reply of petitioners Adorers of the Blood of Christ, United States Province, et al. filed.
2018-12-26
Brief of respondent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in opposition filed.
2018-11-26
Brief of respondent Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company in opposition filed.
2018-11-26
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The Rutherford Institute.
2018-11-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 26, 2018.
2018-11-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 26, 2018 to December 26, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 26, 2018)

Attorneys

Adorers of the Blood of Christ, United States Province, et al.
Jon Dwight YoderGibbel Kraybill and Hess LLP, Petitioner
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al.
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
The Rutherford Institute
John W. Whitehead — Amicus
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company
Elizabeth Utz WitmerSaul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, Respondent