No. 18-5472
Tags: 28-usc-2254 actual-innocence constitutional-claims habeas-corpus mcquiggin-v-perkins miranda-rights prosecutorial-misconduct successive-petition successive-petitions time-bar time-barred
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383 (2013), permits a state court prisoner to rely on "actual innocence" as a gateway to pursue constitutional claims that were previously raised but dismissed (as time barred) in a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McQuiggin v. Perkins permits a state court prisoner to rely on 'actual innocence' as a gateway to pursue constitutional claims that were previously raised but dismissed (as time barred) in a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-31
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Alan Hedrick
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner