No. 18-5460
David Hill v. Brent Reinke, et al.
IFP
Tags: administrative-control-of-facilities baxstrom-v-herold circuit-split constitutional-rights due-process inmate-transfer mental-health mental-health-facility mental-health-facility-transfers prison prison-administration temporary temporary-transfers transfer vitek-v-jones
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
Can a prison or jail, when transferring an inmate to a mental health facility, avoid the due process protections recognized by this Court in Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480 (1980) by (a) transferring the inmate to a mental health facility that is administratively controlled by the prison or jail, or (b) labeling the transfer, which in Mr. Hill's case lasted 41 days, "temporary"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Due-process-rights-of-inmates
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2018)
Attorneys
David Hill