No. 18-5449
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 appeals civil-procedure confrontation criminal-procedure district-court-review double-jeopardy due-process federal-habeas habeas-corpus indictment motion-to-vacate post-conviction-relief self-incrimination sentencing speedy-trial standing
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the district court and court of appeals denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and § 2244 motions despite evidence showing no crime was committed, in violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-31
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2018)
Attorneys
Michael D. Smith
Michael D. Smith — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent