Antoine D. DeGrate v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
HabeasCorpus
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION.
WIHETHER ITS FACT FINDINGS ARE CLEARLY ERRONEOUS.
PRECEPT, IN WHICH CASE REVIEW IS PLENARY.
① WIHETHER ON APPEAL OR PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN AGENC ACTION, THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD AS A WHOLE TO SUPPORT THE ORDER OR DECISION OF THE COURT.
OWHETHER THE AGENCY'S ACTION, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SHTOULD BE HELD UNLAWFAL AWD SET ASIDE FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN 5 U.S.C 3 7OL (2).
RIGHTS - ARTICLE T), IN REGARDS TO INTEGRITY AND ETHICS.
Whether the trial court abused its discretion, whether its fact findings are clearly erroneous, whether it erred in formulating or applying a legal precept, whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the order or decision of the court, whether the agency's action, findings and conclusions should be held unlawful and set aside, and whether the judicial dynamics of the 'deliberative thought process' violated the Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Article 17, in regards to integrity and ethics