No. 18-5440
Larenzo Lomax v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
IFP
Tags: arrest arrest-legality constitutional-rights criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule false-affidavit false-statements fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel search-and-seizure search-warrant sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
DueProcess CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Lomax was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to challenge the legality of Lomaxs arrest.
Whether Lomax was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to challenge the Affidavit in Support of Search Warrant that contained intentional false material statements.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Lomax was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to challenge the legality of Lomax's arrest
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2018)
Attorneys
Larenzo Lomax
Larenzo Lomax — Petitioner