No. 18-5439
Adam Longoria v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act criminal-procedure descamps-v-united-states mathis-v-united-states non-elemental-facts occasions-different sentencing-enhancement serious-drug-offense sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-jury-trial statutory-interpretation taylor-v-united-states violent-felony
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Under the ACCA, can a sentencing court rely solely on non-elemental facts to infer that a defendant's temporally overlapping and related offenses were "committed on occasions different from one another"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the ACCA's 'occasions different from one another' clause requires a sentencing court to rely solely on elemental facts, or whether it can rely on non-elemental facts
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2018)
Attorneys
Adam Longoria
Aliza Hochman Bloom — Office of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent