Does confronting a suspect with the mounting evidence against him fall outside the definition of interrogation because it is unlikely to elicit an incriminating response, as the Ninth Circuit, as well as the First, Fourth, and Eighth Circuits have held, or does such conduct serve no legitimate administrative purposes "attendant to arrest and custody" and irresistibly call for a response, and thus constitute interrogation, as the Second and Third Circuits, and a number of state courts, have held?

Does confronting a suspect with the mounting evidence against him constitute interrogation under Miranda?