UNLAWFULLY ESSIVE, FORCE, FALSE ARREST, SEARCH PROBABLE CAUSE, URE, FALSE ARREST WiTHOU CONSENT FALSE ARREST, IDID Nol CONSENT IDiD SEIDURE, FuL AND ON SEN SEARCH V FALSE MP M ARREST AND IWAs ACcuse CRiME HH HE MMiTTED JicTiON, IDID NoT WRONGFULLY VIOLATION, IDiD NOT CONS N7 DUE PROCESS STiTUTIONAL, RiGHT VIOLATiON UN CONSTiTuTiONAL S OF PROCESS PROSECUTiON. ABUSE MALiCious NOT CONSENT U To pull N VALiD CONSENI FTER ARBEST IDID NOT FROM MY BY HM ANKS ISSUE CREDIT CARDS BANKS CARD THE MY LEGiTiMATE WIPiNG WHICH THERE ARE PRiVATE WARRANT SEARCH M TOTHE CREDIT CARD MAGNETIC SRiPS OP NFORMATION WiTHOUJ CONVICTED MY CARDS WHICH IWAS WRONGFULLY WiTH MY LEGiTiMATE CREDIT CARDS ANY CRIME COMMITTED V.OHARA, EE: PEOPLE V. SANKARA, AND SANKARA MY ARRAIGNMENT COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE, MYTRIAL STHKW RREST CLAIM IWAS PROCESS HAS PRO SE AT SOUTHEH DisTe NEW YORK MY FALSE ARREST CL OF WAS PROCESS HAS PRO SE AT SEE ND CRCUIT oF APPEAL NEW YORK, CoU APPELL REViEW COURT DECLiNE MY CRiMiNAL UNCONSTiTUTIONAL QiLEY CASE V. CALIFORNIA, NN 573 U.S-134 S.CT LIED ZD 430-

Whether the petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights were violated by an unlawful search and seizure, false arrest, and false imprisonment without consent, and whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated by ineffective assistance of counsel at various stages of the criminal proceedings