1. Should this Court use its general supervisory authority to rectify an abuse, when the exceptional time of over two years has lapsed since Petitioner has filed an application for permission to proceed on a second or successive § 2255, when Congress has specifically commanded that the Court of appeals "shall" decide the application "no later then 30 days after filing" 28 USC § 2244(b)(3)(D), and this Court's precedent interpreting this statute held the court of appeals "must make a decision on the application within 30 days," Tyler v Cain, 533 US 656, 664 (2001)?

Whether the First Circuit Court of Appeals has abused its discretion by failing to decide petitioner's application for permission to file a second or successive § 2255 motion within the 30-day statutory deadline