WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRONEOUSLY EXCLUDED THE STATEMENTS OF
UNAVAILABLE WITNESSES, THEREBY DENYING PETITIONER THE RIGHT TO
PRESENT A COMPLETE DEFENSE IN VIOLATIION OF THE FIFTH AND SIXTH
AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION; AND

2) WHETHER THE EXCLUDED STATEMENTS THAT WERE MADE BY:: FOREIGN NATIONALS
TO OFFICERS OF THE COURT IN ANTICIPATION TO LATER TESTIFY AT ANOTHER LEGAL
PROCEEDING SHOULD HAVE BEEN ADMISSIBLE UNDER THE HEARSAY RULE OF EVIDENCE.

Whether the district court erred in excluding exculpatory witness statements under the Confrontation Clause and Federal Rule of Evidence 807 despite the statements' reliability and the witnesses' unavailability