WHETHER: THE DISTRICT COURT SHOULD HAVE SUPPRESSED ALL OF THE FRUITS OF THE POISONOUS TREE BASED UPON THE FOUND TO BE CORRUPTED OFFICIALS AND THE ILLEGAL TRASH PULLS THAT WERE USED TO MISLEAD THE MAGISTRATE TO OBTAIN A WARRANT?

WHETHER THE PETITIONER WAS DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL ON THE TRIAL LEVEL AND APPEAL LEVEL WHEN THE TRIAL COUNSEL DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE PLEA CONDITIONS AND THE APPEAL COUNSEL FAILED TO RAISE THE CAREER OFFENDER ISSUE BUT INSTEAD RAISED A ISSUE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PETITIONERS CASE?

Whether the district court should have suppressed all of the fruits of the poisonous tree based upon the found to be corrupted officials and the illegal trash pulls that were used to mislead the magistrate to obtain a warrant?