DEFENDANT SEEKS THIS SUPREME COURT'S REVIEW OF HIS ABOVE GUIDELINES SENTENCE IMPOSED WITHIN AN INCORRECT GUIDELINES RANGE UTILIZING "ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE" WHICH SEVERLY AFFECTS PETITIONER'S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF THE RULING IN MOLINA-MARTINEZ V. U.S., 578 U.S. 136 S.CT. 1338, 194 L.ED. 444 (2016); ROSALES-MIRELES V. U.S. 2018 BL 214344 U.S. NO. 16-9493 (JUNE 18, 2018).

Whether the defendant's substantial rights were affected by the district court's use of 'additional evidence' in imposing a guidelines sentence within an incorrect guidelines range