No. 18-536
Tags: 'appellate-jurisdiction' 'civil-jurisdiction' 'compelled-consent' 'plea-to-the-jurisdiction' 'special-appearance' 'tex-transp-code-unconstitutional' appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights compelled-consent due-process jurisdiction plea-to-jurisdiction special-appearance standing takings texas-transportation-code transportation-code
Key Terms:
Privacy Jurisdiction
Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Are the federal question (compelled consent) rulings "final?"
Did the 5th Dist. CoA err by refusing to exercise "civil" jurisdiction?
Did the 5th Dist. CoA err by tacitly affirming the denial of Special Appearance(s)?
Did the 5th Dist. CoA err by tacitly affirming the denial of Plea(s) to the Jurisdiction?
Is the TEX. TRANSP. CODE unconstitutional, as applied?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal question rulings on compelled consent are final
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 23, 2018)
Attorneys
Harmon L. Taylor
Harmon L. Taylor — Petitioner