No. 18-5350
Carroll Erman Crider v. Virginia
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights conviction-vacatur criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus indictment indictment-notice jurisdiction notice standing statutory-violation
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
#1 .Did the Supreme Court of Virginia err when it didn't determine that Crider was entitled to relief to vacate the judgment when the statute of Virginia was violated Va. § Code 19.-220 by the Commonwealth not giving Crider an adequate indictment notice to defend himself?
Should Crider's Convictions be vacated because the commonwealth never acquired jurisdiction over his person or the case because it was never proven on the face of the record that the alleged crimes were committed in the Commonwealth of Virginia?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Crider's convictions should be vacated due to lack of jurisdiction and inadequate indictment notice
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent Virginia to respond filed.
2018-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 24, 2018)
Attorneys
Carroll E. Crider
Carroll Erman Crider — Petitioner
Virginia
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent