No. 18-5322
Santiago Hum Rodriguez-Aparicio v. United States
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure discretionary-relief due-process fundamental-fairness illegal-reentry immigration immigration-law mendoza-lopez removal-order removal-proceeding uniformity
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the failure to inform an alien of his eligibility for discretionary relief in a removal proceeding is a due process violation that can make the proceeding fundamentally unfair.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the failure to inform an alien of his eligibility for discretionary relief in a removal proceeding is a due process violation that can make the proceeding fundamentally unfair
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-10-24
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 24, 2018.
2018-08-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 24, 2018 to October 24, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 24, 2018.
2018-08-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 24, 2018 to September 24, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 24, 2018)
Attorneys
Santiago Humberto Rodriguez-Aparicio
Kayla Gassmann — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent