No. 18-5305
Aubry Rae Johnson v. Paul Copenhaver, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure double-counting due-process federal-custody federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus habeas-petition jurisdiction primary-jurisdiction sentencing state-custody time-served
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. commencing where federal authorities do not have primary jurisdiction of the inmate?
2. May a state's primary jurisdiction over an inmate only be relinquished by consent?
3. Does 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) present an overall federal scheme custody?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 18 U.S.C. § 3585 prevent a federal sentence from commencing where federal authorities do not have primary jurisdiction of the inmate?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2018)
Attorneys
Aubry Rae Johnson
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent